Uncategorized Archives - https://ftilaw.com/award-journal/f/category/uncategorized/ FCPA Whistleblower Attorney | Only Pay If You Win | FBR Wed, 03 Apr 2024 13:58:59 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://i0.wp.com/fbr.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/cropped-400Pngsmaller.png?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 Uncategorized Archives - https://ftilaw.com/award-journal/f/category/uncategorized/ 32 32 215649297 What is the FEPA and What Does it Mean for Businesses?  https://ftilaw.com/award-journal/f/what-is-the-fepa-and-what-does-it-mean-for-businesses/ Wed, 03 Apr 2024 13:58:34 +0000 https://ftilaw.com/?p=3151 Article by Akarachi Ekeh, FBR Intern Class 2023-2024 The Foreign Extortion Prevention Act (FEPA), enacted on December 22, 2023, as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, stands as a pivotal addition to U.S. anti-corruption legislation. It addresses a crucial aspect often overlooked by its predecessor, the Foreign Corrupt Practices […]

The post What is the FEPA and What Does it Mean for Businesses?  appeared first on .

]]>

Article by Akarachi Ekeh, FBR Intern Class 2023-2024

The Foreign Extortion Prevention Act (FEPA), enacted on December 22, 2023, as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, stands as a pivotal addition to U.S. anti-corruption legislation. It addresses a crucial aspect often overlooked by its predecessor, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), by focusing on the “demand side” of foreign bribery transactions. [1] 

FEPA empowers U.S. authorities to prosecute foreign officials who demand or accept bribes from U.S. citizens, U.S. companies, or within the U.S. Unlike the FCPA, which focuses on the “supply side”—those offering bribes—FEPA broadens the anti-corruption framework to encompass both the ‘supplier’ and the ‘demander’ of bribes. [2] 

The legislation carries far-reaching implications for businesses operating globally, aiming to create a fair and ethical business environment. It broadens the definition of a “foreign official” beyond the FCPA’s scope, encompassing individuals acting unofficially on behalf of a government, agency, or public international organization. [3] 

Under FEPA, foreign officials engaging in corrupt activities can face imprisonment for up to 15 years and fines reaching $250,000 or three times the value of the bribe (whichever is greater). The Department of Justice (DOJ) is mandated to submit an annual report to Congress, detailing the prevalence of conduct covered by FEPA and the DOJ’s effectiveness in enforcing it. 

FEPA‘s jurisdictional reach extends beyond U.S. borders, allowing for the indictment of foreign officials in federal court or freezing of assets, even if they are not physically present in the United Kingdom. However, practical challenges, including diplomatic complexities and extradition issues, remain inherent. [4] 

The legal community has expressed diverse opinions on FEPA. Critics raise uncertainties about its enforcement and effectiveness, particularly in dealing with influential foreign officials.[5] On the other hand, supporters view FEPA as a crucial complement to the FCPA, addressing the demand side and enhancing the United Kingdom’ ability to combat international corruption. “This, without question, is the most consequential anti-foreign-bribery law passed in almost 50 years,” said Scott Greytak, director of advocacy for Transparency International U.S.”[6] 

For businesses, FEPA may serve as a deterrent to corrupt practices, enhancing compliance measures, and mitigating risks associated with international business transactions. The legislation provides whistleblower protection, contributing to a transparent business environment. It offers a basis for training and education, fostering improved corporate governance globally. [7] 

In conclusion, FEPA represents a significant stride in the U.S. government’s commitment to combating corruption globally. Businesses should try to grasp the intricacies of FEPA with the aim of contributing to a more ethical and transparent international business landscape. Staying informed and using FEPA as a compliance tool will be crucial for companies navigating the complexities of international business. 

 

Footnotes

Congress Enacts the Foreign Extortion Prevention Act Targeting Foreign Officials’ Conduct | WilmerHale – JDSupra 

2 Ibid 

U.S. Prosecutors Can Charge Foreign Officials With Bribery Under New Provision – WSJ 

Congress Enacts the Foreign Extortion Prevention Act Targeting Foreign Officials’ Conduct | WilmerHale – JDSupra 

Congress Passes the Foreign Extortion Prevention Act (natlawreview.com) 

6 Remarks by Scott Greytak, Director of Advocacy for Transparency International U.S. 

7 New Anti-Extortion Law Expands Liability for Global Corruption (bloomberglaw.com) 

The post What is the FEPA and What Does it Mean for Businesses?  appeared first on .

]]>
3151
JP Morgan Hit with $18 Million Penalty for Gagging SEC Whistleblowers https://ftilaw.com/award-journal/f/jpm-whistleblower-fine/ Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:49:17 +0000 https://ftilaw.com/?p=2879 On January 16, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS) agreed to pay an $18 million fine to resolve charges over violating whistleblower protection. According to the SEC order, from March 2020 through July 2023, JPMS routinely compelled certain advisory clients and brokerage customers receiving over $1,000 in credits or […]

The post JP Morgan Hit with $18 Million Penalty for Gagging SEC Whistleblowers appeared first on .

]]>

On January 16, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS) agreed to pay an $18 million fine to resolve charges over violating whistleblower protection. According to the SEC order, from March 2020 through July 2023, JPMS routinely compelled certain advisory clients and brokerage customers receiving over $1,000 in credits or settlements to sign confidentiality agreements barring them from reporting any related facts or allegations to the SEC. By preventing clients from approaching the SEC, the firm violated explicit prohibitions on impeding individuals from reporting possible securities law breaches. While many people focus on the SEC’s work issuing whistleblower rewards, the JPMS decision shows that the SEC is using both the carrot and the stick to protect and encourage whistleblowing in the financial industry. 

Impermissible Gag Orders to Hundreds of Retail Customers

As outlined in the SEC’s order, JPMS had a standard practice of requiring non-disclosure agreements when issuing resolutions over $1,000 to retail clients. The agreements prohibited clients from disclosing the settlement itself and any information regarding the circumstances and accounts involved, or even the mere existence of the agreement to any third party.

According to the order, “while the Release permitted clients to respond to inquiries from the Commission, it did not permit voluntary communications with the Commission concerning potential securities law violations.” By denying clients the affirmative ability to approach the SEC, the agreements directly violated Rule 21F-17(a), which unambiguously forbids “enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement…with respect to such communications.”

The order notes that JPMS compelled over 362 clients to sign gag orders from 2020 through 2023, with settlement values ranging from approximately $1,000 to $165,000. In some instances, the firm offered extra compensation exceeding the initial resolution amount to convince clients to accept the non-disclosure provisions. 

While JPMS did independently report certain cases to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) as required by separate FINRA regulations, this mandatory reporting failed to offset prohibitions on voluntary SEC whistleblowing. As SEC Enforcement Division Co-Chief Corey Schuster stated in the press release, “those drafting or using confidentiality agreements need to ensure that they do not include provisions that impede potential whistleblowers.”

Explicit Prohibitions Against Potential Whistleblower Retaliation

The Commission implemented Rule 21F-17(a) in 2011 explicitly to bar corporations from attempting to mute prospective whistleblowers through restrictive severance agreement provisions and similar measures. Both the SEC order and press release clearly frame the case as unlawful retaliation against individuals potentially approaching the SEC about financial misconduct.

JPMS compelled clients “into the untenable position of choosing between receiving settlements or credits from the firm and reporting potential securities law violations to the SEC.” Such binary choices between remuneration and approaching regulators represent exactly the sort of coercive trade-off Rule 21F-17(a) aims to eliminate.

The Enforcement Division Director Gurbir S. Grewal bluntly stated in the press release, “Whether it’s in your employment contracts, settlement agreements or elsewhere, you simply cannot include provisions that prevent individuals from contacting the SEC with evidence of wrongdoing…For several years, [JPMS] forced certain clients into the untenable position of choosing between receiving settlements or credits from the firm and reporting potential securities law violations to the SEC. This either-or proposition not only undermined critical investor protections and placed investors at risk, but was also illegal.”

Ongoing Prioritization of Unfettered Whistleblower Rights

Statements from high-ranking SEC personnel in the order and press release explicitly characterize this case as the latest action to strengthen safeguards for would-be whistleblowers. The Commission sees the capacity for company employees and industry members to freely notify regulators of possible wrongdoing as an integral “critical component” for enforcement and achieving the SEC’s objectives.

Regulators are closely scrutinizing materials that appear to subtly compel employees to stay silent about violations. Previous cases like the 2022 Health Net settlement and punishments against BlackRock and BlueLinx Holdings targeting restrictive severance clause language, send a clear cautionary message to all companies drafting any contracts or compliance policies with provisions that could dissuade people from reporting misconduct.

By imposing a sizable $18 million penalty over gag order agreements, the SEC offered an unmistakable signal that stifling individuals from reporting violations will engender severe consequences. Any business seeking to avoid similar censure must ensure employee exit arrangements, resolution deals, and related materials never impede prospective whistleblowers from approaching regulators.

Authors: Harsh Sidhapurker and John Peterson

The post JP Morgan Hit with $18 Million Penalty for Gagging SEC Whistleblowers appeared first on .

]]>
2879
SAP Fined Over $220 Million For Bribery and Corruption https://ftilaw.com/award-journal/f/sap-fined-over-220-million-for-bribery-and-corruption/ Mon, 15 Jan 2024 19:41:43 +0000 https://ftilaw.com/?p=2849 On January 10, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) announced settled charges against SAP, a multinational tech company, for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). The Germany-based company was accused of bribing government officials in South Africa, Malawi, Kenya, Tanzania, Ghana, Indonesia, and Azerbaijan. However, this is not the […]

The post SAP Fined Over $220 Million For Bribery and Corruption appeared first on .

]]>

On January 10, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) announced settled charges against SAP, a multinational tech company, for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). The Germany-based company was accused of bribing government officials in South Africa, Malawi, Kenya, Tanzania, Ghana, Indonesia, and Azerbaijan. However, this is not the first time SAP has faced a fine for bribery-related misconduct.  

First Offense: 2016 FCPA Fine 

In 2016, the SEC charged SAP with books and records and internal accounting controls violations in connection with a bribery scheme in Panama. The fine required only the disgorgement of $3.7 million in profits and did not involve the DOJ. However, it was likely a missed opportunity for SAP to address bribery-related misconduct.  

Second Offense: 2023 FCPA Fine 

SAP’s second FCPA fine is much larger and involves misconduct spanning several countries. The DOJ alleged that, SAP, through its agents, engaged in a scheme from at least 2013 to bribe officials and falsify records to gain improper advantages in various contracts with government entities in South Africa and Indonesia. The bribe payments to South African and Indonesian foreign officials were in the form of cash payments, political contributions, and wire and other electronic transfers, along with luxury goods purchased during shopping trips, in return for valuable government business. In addition to these allegations, the SEC charged further misconduct relating to payments to government officials in Malawi, Kenya, Tanzania, Ghana, Indonesia, and Azerbaijan. 

Settlement and DPA   

As a result of the misconduct, SAP will pay over $220 million to resolve the investigations from U.S. regulators and may face further liability from South African authorities who assisted in the investigation. Additionally, SAP entered into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement (DPA), which requires significant enhancements to the company’s compliance program, and annual reporting to the DOJ on improvements. The DPA will also impose a positive legal obligation to disclose any further FCPA violations that are identified internally during the three years. 

 

Authors: Yu Tong Wang, John Peterson 

The post SAP Fined Over $220 Million For Bribery and Corruption appeared first on .

]]>
2849
ArcelorMittal Employees – Know Your Rights https://ftilaw.com/award-journal/f/arcelormittal-employees-know-your-rights/ Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:16:45 +0000 https://ftilaw.com/?p=2786 ArcelorMittal received over 200 reports of fraud last year, but the company found none to be significant. If you are a whistleblower who reported bribery or corruption, you may be surprised to hear that reporting to the company is not your only option. If you have witnessed serious fraud, such as bribery or corruption, you […]

The post ArcelorMittal Employees – Know Your Rights appeared first on .

]]>

ArcelorMittal received over 200 reports of fraud last year, but the company found none to be significant. If you are a whistleblower who reported bribery or corruption, you may be surprised to hear that reporting to the company is not your only option. If you have witnessed serious fraud, such as bribery or corruption, you can report it anonymously, for free, to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In addition, if your information leads to a fine, you can obtain a reward. The average whistleblower reward paid by the SEC is ~$5 million dollars. and the largest award was over $200 million for a whistleblower who reported FCPA violations. 

The SEC Whistleblower Rewards Program

The possibility of rewards comes from the SEC Whistleblower Rewards Program. If you haven’t heard of it, that’s probably because companies may not want you to know about this program. The program allows employees (from any country) to report misconduct anonymously to the SEC and claim a reward for reporting. Even if you already reported misconduct internally at ArcelorMittal, you can still claim a reward by reporting to the SEC, provided you act quickly. Time is of the essence when it comes to claiming a reward as the program has strict deadlines for reporting and claiming a reward.  Only the first person to report information gets credit for it, so if you don’t act quickly, someone else could claim your reward.

How Do I Report?

Reporting is easy if you use an award-winning whistleblower law firm like FBR. FBR is a whistleblower law firm in New York that has already helped clients all over the world report millions of dollars in fraud and corruption. FBR provides confidential consultations for free to help you figure out if you could claim a reward. FBR does not charge clients unless they obtain a reward and represents numerous clients from outside the U.S.  Using the experienced attorneys at FBR will help ensure that you can report quickly, correctly and anonymously. If you want a free confidential consultation with our experienced whistleblower attorneys, click here, to get in touch. Alternatively, you can take our anonymous online evaluation:

Even if you’re not interested in reporting to the SEC, it’s important that you speak to a lawyer so have enough information to make an informed decision. Reporting in the wrong way or to the wrong person can affect your legal right to be protected from retaliation, your ability to bring a lawsuit against the company and your ability to claim a whistleblower reward. An experienced whistleblower attorney can show you the correct procedure for reporting, ensure you respect legal rules and company rules. Given that consultations are provided for free and covered by the attorney-client privilege, there is no sense in waiting for someone else to claim your reward. Speak to one of our experienced whistleblower attorneys here or that our award-winning online whistleblower evaluation at the bottom of this page.

Can I Report Anonymously?

Yes, provided you use an attorney licensed in the U.S. you can report anonymously to the SEC. This means your attorney can ensure that your identity is never publicly revealed, even if you win a whistleblower reward.

Who Is Entitled To Rewards?

The program is open to people from any country and there is no requirement that you work for ArcelorMittal. People who work for contractors, subsidiaries or suppliers can also participate. The main exclusions from the program are lawyers, who typically cannot qualify for rewards. In addition, people who work in compliance or internal audit are eligible, but must follow special procedures when reporting. If you fall into any of these categories, we highly recommend speaking with an attorney.

What If I Was Involved In The Misconduct?

Even people who were involved in the misconduct can report it to the SEC and claim a reward.  However, participating in the rewards program does not guarantee immunity. This is why you should speak to an attorney before reporting. There is no substitution for experienced legal advice.

What Type of Conduct Can I Report?

FBR helps clients report bribery or corruption, often known as violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). FCPA violations have resulted in some of the largest rewards and that is our focus. If you have information on a possible FCPA violation, you should contact us now.

In addition to FCPA violations, you can also report any of the following:

  • Accounting fraud; 
  • Investor fraud;
  • Failure to keep accurate books and records;
  • Serious breach of internal controls; 
  • Insider trading;
  • Serious corporate governance failures; and
  • Revenue manipulation.

If you have information about any of the above, you may have information that could lead to a whistleblower reward. If you have any questions, feel free to give us a call.

Why Work With FBR?

FBR is an award-winning law firm that reports corporate crime, specifically bribery and corruption. Our team is led by award-winning New York whistleblower attorney John Peterson. John has worked for almost a decade on corporate crime and corruption cases around the globe involving the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Serious Frauds Office and the Financial Conduct Authority. John focuses exclusively on the FCPA, whistleblower and securities laws, and regularly contributes for major media outlets such as Reuters, MSN, Yahoo and Bloomberg. Most recently, John was named a “Top Lawyer” by Authority Magazine, featured on “Meet The Experts” by LexisNexis and led the FBR team to win the New World Report Award for Legal Innovation.  

SEC Whistleblower Client-
Read More
“Gave me the confidence I was doing the right thing”
FCPA Whistleblower Client-
Read More
“Professional and attentive . . . knows the law and understands how to approach a case ”
SEC Whistleblower Client-
Read More
“Awesome. Pleasure working with them”
Whistleblower Client-
Read More
“A trustworthy partner”
FCPA Whistleblower Client-
Read More
“Marvelous work ”
FCPA Whistleblower Client-
Read More
“Precise, clear, professional ”
Previous
Next

FBR is one of the only law firms in the world who focus on FCPA reporting and has a history of helping clients report millions of dollars in bribes and corrupt payments:

Recent Highlights 

  • Profiled in Corporate Crime Reporter for our work with FCPA whistleblowers  
  • Featured on Bloomberg News
  • Named a 2022 “Top Lawyer” by Authority Magazine
  • Appeared on Reuters to discuss the effects of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine on FCPA enforcement 
  • Represents several foreign clients in FCPA investigations before the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
  • Won the New World Report Award for Legal Innovation
 

If you’re considering becoming a whistleblower, get a free consultation from award-winning attorney John Peterson now.

Have more questions?

Speak directly with an award-winning attorney for a free consultation

The post ArcelorMittal Employees – Know Your Rights appeared first on .

]]>
2786
Corporate Enforcement Actions On The Rise https://ftilaw.com/award-journal/f/corporate-enforcement-actions-on-the-rise/ Fri, 19 May 2023 13:25:05 +0000 https://ftilaw.com/?p=1035 In recent years, the United Kingdom has witnessed a significant increase in corporate enforcement actions, as regulatory agencies and law enforcement agencies intensify their efforts to hold corporations accountable for wrongdoing. This surge in enforcement actions reflects a growing emphasis on corporate compliance, transparency, and ethical conduct in the business world. In this article, we […]

The post Corporate Enforcement Actions On The Rise appeared first on .

]]>

In recent years, the United Kingdom has witnessed a significant increase in corporate enforcement actions, as regulatory agencies and law enforcement agencies intensify their efforts to hold corporations accountable for wrongdoing. This surge in enforcement actions reflects a growing emphasis on corporate compliance, transparency, and ethical conduct in the business world. In this article, we will delve into the factors driving this trend, explore notable cases, and discuss the potential implications for businesses and the overall economy.

  1. The Regulatory Landscape

One crucial factor contributing to the rise in corporate enforcement actions is the evolving regulatory landscape. Regulatory agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), have bolstered their enforcement capabilities and become more proactive in investigating corporate misconduct. They have been given greater authority, increased resources, and additional tools to uncover and prosecute violations.

Moreover, legislative reforms like the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) have expanded the reach of regulatory agencies, enabling them to pursue wrongdoings more aggressively. This regulatory evolution has shifted the balance in favor of stricter oversight, leading to heightened scrutiny of corporate actions.

  1. Increased Interagency Collaboration

Another contributing factor to the rise in corporate enforcement actions is the improved interagency collaboration among regulatory bodies. Various agencies are now working in tandem to identify and address complex cases of corporate wrongdoing. This collaborative approach has proven effective in pooling expertise, sharing information, and coordinating efforts, leading to more comprehensive investigations and prosecutions.

For instance, the establishment of task forces comprising investigators from multiple agencies has enabled a holistic approach to tackle issues such as securities fraud, insider trading, money laundering, and antitrust violations. This level of collaboration has increased the chances of detecting and penalizing corporate misconduct, as it removes jurisdictional barriers and ensures a more efficient utilization of resources.

  1. Emphasis on Individual Accountability

In recent years, there has been a shift in focus from solely penalizing corporations to holding individuals accountable for their roles in corporate misconduct. This change is evident in the increasing number of enforcement actions targeting high-ranking executives, board members, and key decision-makers. By pursuing individuals responsible for illegal activities, regulatory agencies aim to deter future wrongdoing and create a culture of accountability.

The “Yates Memo,” issued by the DOJ in 2015, further reinforced this focus on individual accountability. It emphasized the importance of identifying and prosecuting individuals involved in corporate misconduct, thereby fostering a stronger deterrent effect.

  1. Notable Cases and Impact

Several high-profile corporate enforcement actions have made headlines, illustrating the severity of the issue and the determination of regulatory agencies to address corporate wrongdoing. One such case involved Wells Fargo, which faced significant penalties for fraudulent sales practices. The bank was fined billions of dollars and faced reputational damage, highlighting the repercussions of non-compliance.

In the pharmaceutical industry, the opioid crisis led to enforcement actions against pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors involved in the improper marketing and distribution of opioids. These actions have resulted in substantial financial penalties and criminal charges, signaling a commitment to tackling public health crises caused by corporate misconduct.

The rise in corporate enforcement actions has also affected the tech industry. Tech giants like Facebook and Google have faced scrutiny over privacy violations, anticompetitive practices, and data breaches, leading to hefty fines and increased regulatory oversight. These cases reflect the growing recognition that even the most influential corporations are not immune to regulatory action.

  1. Implications for Businesses

The increased focus on corporate enforcement actions has far-reaching implications for businesses. Companies are now compelled to prioritize compliance, risk management, and ethical practices more than ever before. Failure to do so can result in severe financial penalties and severe reputational risk. 

The post Corporate Enforcement Actions On The Rise appeared first on .

]]>
1035
Should I Use the Brinks Compliance and Ethics Whistleblower Hotline? https://ftilaw.com/award-journal/f/should-i-use-the-brinks-compliance-and-ethics-whistleblower-hotline/ Wed, 10 May 2023 20:12:05 +0000 https://ftilaw.com/?p=952 Becoming a whistleblower can be daunting, but if you work at a company like Brink’s, becoming a whistleblower could be easier and more rewarding than you think. This is because Brink’s is regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which means that employees of Brink’s are able to participate in the SEC whistleblower […]

The post Should I Use the Brinks Compliance and Ethics Whistleblower Hotline? appeared first on .

]]>

Becoming a whistleblower can be daunting, but if you work at a company like Brink’s, becoming a whistleblower could be easier and more rewarding than you think. This is because Brink’s is regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which means that employees of Brink’s are able to participate in the SEC whistleblower rewards program. This program allows employees to report legal violations to the SEC anonymously, and, if the SEC uses your information to obtain a fine, you can claim a reward for being the whistleblower. The average reward paid by the SEC is ~$5 million dollars.

If you’ve witnessed bribery, corruption or any compliance violation and are considering using the Brink’s ethics hotline or whistleblower hotline, here are five things you should consider first:  

  1. Figure out if you’ve witnessed a ‘securities law’ violation
  2. Make sure you preserve evidence 
  3. Speak to a lawyer (for free) 
  4. Consider reporting to the SEC 
  5. Consider reporting directly to the company
 

In this article we’ll walk you through each of these steps, give you some tips on how to protect yourself from retaliation. Before we do that, let’s take a quick look at the company itself. 

Brink’s

Brink’s is a company which provides security services and asset protection to a variety of businesses and organizations. Originally, the company exclusively offered smaller scaled armored transportation services, but has grown to provide financial logistics and secure transportation for domestic and international entities, including banks, stores, government agencies, mints, and jewelry companies. It also provides protection and security services for valuable art, management and monitoring for ATMs, and cash management services like vault outsourcing and money processing. The company has stock traded in the United Kingdom on the NYSE.

Brink’s encourages employees to speak up in its corporate governance materials and has a Code of Ethics (available here) that details the company’s integrity efforts, internal controls and core business principals, which include: 

  • Exhibiting ethical leadership;
  • Promptly and fairly investigating concerns;
  • Providing equal opportunities for all employees; and
  • Treating everyone with dignity and respect.
 

Notwithstanding this, Brink’s has had its share of legal troubles for non-compliance with United Kingdom laws. Most recently, the SEC charged the company for violating protections for whistleblowers. Brink’s was found to have required employees to sign restrictive agreements that violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which prohibits companies from interfering with a whistleblower’s right to report to the SEC. The company did not admit or deny the SEC’s findings, but it did agree to cooperate with the SEC and paid penalties, including a fine of $40,000.

If you’ve witnessed conduct that you believe violated the company’s Code of Business Ethics or the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), you should consider the following steps before making a complaint internally. 

  1. Figure Out If You Witnessed a Securities Violation

The first step in becoming a whistleblower is determining where to report allegations of misconduct. Whistleblowers who have witnessed a “securities law violation” get preferential treatment under U.S. law that allows them to report anonymously, be protected from retaliation and claim a whistleblower reward for reporting.

Securities law violations typically occur when a company engages in some form of fraud, but common examples of securities violations include: 

  • Violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA);
  • Bribery or corruption;
  • Insider trading;
  • Accounting fraud; 
  • Investor fraud;
  • Failure to keep accurate books and records;
  • Serious breach of internal controls; 
  • Serious corporate governance failures; and
  • Revenue manipulation.
 

If you have information about any of the above, you may have witnessed a securities law violation which means you may be eligible for the SEC’s whistleblower rewards program. This applies even if the violation was committed by contractors, suppliers, consultants, sales agents or other third parties in the supply chain.

If the allegation you want to report doesn’t fall into these categories, it still might be of interest to federal regulators. As a result, the best course of action for any potential whistleblower is to speak to a lawyer, which you can usually do for free (see part 3 below).   

  1. Make Sure You Preserve Evidence 

If you decide to become a whistleblower, there is no guarantee that making a complaint will lead to an investigation. In fact, the odds are against whistleblowers: out of over 20,000 tips, referrals and complaints the SEC receives annually from individuals, it is estimated only 5% get investigated. As a result, it’s important for whistleblowers to give their allegation the best chance of leading to an investigation. One way to do this is to preserve evidence

Having evidence of the allegation preserved or knowing where evidence can be found is critical to ensuring that the person investigating the wrongdoing can verify your complaint. Even if you report the violation to your supervisor, management, compliance, or the audit committee, there is no guarantee that evidence will be preserved or that you will continue to have access to it. As a result, you should take steps to preserve the integrity of the evidence so that compliance, general counsel, the audit committee or regulators can thoroughly investigate the allegation.

Importantlytaking or copying company documents can breach your employment agreement. If you are copying the documents solely to provide to U.S. regulators or law enforcement, you shouldn’t worry too much about this, but it’s important to respect procedure and get advice from an experienced whistleblower attorney (which you can usually do for free) so that you don’t trip yourself up on legal issues.  

  1. Talk To A Lawyer (For Free)

If you are thinking of becoming a whistleblower it’s critical that you speak to an experienced whistleblower attorney. Not only is this easy to do, but it’s usually free. For example, the award-winning team at FBR have international experience representing whistleblowers and should be your first stop. Their team offer free consultations to whistleblowers, represent clients all over the world and they will help figure out what your options are. In addition, FBR also provides a free online evaluation for whistleblowers who want to get an idea of the strength of their case. 

Even if you’re not interested in reporting to the SEC, it’s important that you speak to a lawyer so have enough information to make an informed decision. Reporting in the wrong way or to the wrong person can affect your legal right to be protected from retaliation, your ability to bring a lawsuit against the company and your ability to claim a whistleblower reward. An experienced whistleblower attorney can show you the correct procedure for reporting, ensure you respect legal rules and company rules. Given that consultations are provided for free and covered by the attorney-client privilege, there is really no downside to speaking with a lawyer. We recommend contacting one here or taking FBR’s award-winning online whistleblower evaluation.

  1. Consider Reporting to the SEC

Once you have spoken to a lawyer you should have a good idea of the potential pitfalls of reporting internally and the benefits associated with reporting to an agency like the SEC, which are: 

  • You can report legal violations anonymously;
  • You can gain protection against retaliation from your employer under United Kingdom law; and
  • You can become eligible for a whistleblower reward, some of which are over $100 million.
 

There is very little downside to reporting violations to the SEC, as the SEC handles its own investigations and there is no need to file a lawsuit. When it comes to claiming a whistleblower reward, there are special rules for how to report if you are a lawyer, director, officer or work in the compliance or audit team. However, most employees and executives will qualify for the SEC whistleblower reward program provided they can provide “original information” about a securities law violation. In fact, the SEC whistleblower rewards program is not limited to employees, it is also open to people who work as contractors, consultants, sales agents, suppliers or other third parties in the supply chain.

In any event, the decision to report to the SEC should be made in consultation and with the guidance of your lawyer. If you’re not ready to speak to a lawyer you can start by taking this free online evaluation to check your eligibility for the SEC whistleblower rewards program.

  1. Consider Reporting Internally 

Companies often have an ethics hotline, compliance hotline or other reporting channel that allows employees to report concerns directly to the company. In addition, companies often allow employees to report directly to management, the audit committee, the human resource department, chief financial officer (CFO), chief operating officer or even the chief executive officer (CEO). For example, there is a Brink’s whistleblower hotline (more information here) where employees, suppliers and contractors can report ethical concerns such as: 

  • fraud;
  • corporate governance issues;
  • bribery and corruption;
  • FCPA;
  • internal controls issues; and
  • violations of the false claims act and other violations of company policy.
 

In addition, Brink’s also recommends reporting concerns internally. However, reporting integrity violations internally can be a precarious move. Not only can it negatively affect your legal rights when it comes to protection from retaliation, it could also expose you to harassment. Harassment of whistleblowers is not an uncommon business practice at large corporations and it’s important to engage in risk management when becoming a whistleblower to minimize the chances of retaliation. This is especially true if your complaint involves an allegation against the integrity of a more senior employee such as a director, vice president, executive vice president or officer of the company. 

One of the most important things that you can do to reduce the risk of retaliation is to maintain your anonymity. Staying anonymous when reporting and during any investigations is harder than it sounds. This is why you should speak to a lawyer to make sure you don’t accidentally reveal your identity when making a compliance report through a company’s ethics hotline. There are many documented cases of companies who retaliated against whistleblowers, as a result, we always recommend that employees speak to qualified legal counsel before reporting internally. This is especially true if the legal violations include bribery, corruption or violations of the FCPA, which can result in criminal investigations by law enforcement agencies such as the United Kingdom Department of Justice.

The post Should I Use the Brinks Compliance and Ethics Whistleblower Hotline? appeared first on .

]]>
952